Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] checkpatch: improve handling of revert commits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 8/21/21 10:12 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-08-21 at 09:47 +0300, Denis Efremov wrote:
>>
>> On 8/20/21 1:17 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>
>>> And I'm not sure if this particular ERROR is that useful overall.
>>
>> I find it useful to check commit-id and that it matches a title.
>> It's easy to make a typo in commit-id and get an invalid one.
> 
> That's true, but I meant requiring the sha1 hash to contain both
> the word "commit" and use ("title").
> 
> Looking at checkpatch's errors produced by this GIT_COMMIT_ID
> test makes the required form seem a bit too inflexible to me.
> 
> For instance: a sha1 hash may be repeated in a commit message where
> the first instance has the correct form but the second use is just
> the hash and the warning is still produced.
> 

I agree with you. There is also another example with list of commits:
 - commit <id-1> ("Title1")
 - commit <id-2> ("Title2")
...

I see no reason in writing "commit" on each line.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux