Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/bpf: enlarge select() timeout for test_maps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Aug 18, 2021, at 6:15 PM, Li Zhijian <lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 0Day robot observed that it's easily timeout on a heavy load host.
> -------------------
> # selftests: bpf: test_maps
> # Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
> # Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
> # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap'
> # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu'
> # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes'
> # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk'
> # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap'
> # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu'
> # Failed sockmap unexpected timeout
> not ok 3 selftests: bpf: test_maps # exit=1
> # selftests: bpf: test_lru_map
> # nr_cpus:8
> -------------------
> Since this test will be scheduled by 0Day to a random host that could have
> only a few cpus(2-8), enlarge the timeout to avoid a false NG report.
> 
> In practice, i tried to pin it to only one cpu by 'taskset 0x01 ./test_maps',
> and knew 10S is likely enough, but i still perfer to a larger value 30.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux