On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 7:50 PM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 8/10/21 2:19 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > > On 8/9/21 10:31 PM, Shoaib Rao wrote: > >> On 8/9/21 1:09 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >>> I am guessing that even your test would trigger the warning, > >>> if you make sure to include CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y in your kernel build. > >> Eric, > >> > >> Thanks for the pointer, have you ever over looked at something when coding? > >> > > I _think_ I was trying to help, not shaming you in any way. > How did the previous email help? I did not get any reply when I asked > what could be the cause. Which previous email ? Are you expecting immediate answers to your emails ? I am not working for Oracle. > > > > My question about spinlock/mutex was not sarcastic, you authored > > 6 official linux patches, there is no evidence for linux kernel expertise. > > That is no measure of someones understanding. There are other OS's as > well. I have worked on Solaris and other *unix* OS's for over 20+ years. > This was an oversight on my part and I apologize, but instead of > questioning my expertise it would have been helpful to say what might > have caused it. I sent two emails with _useful_ _information_. If you felt you were attacked, I suggest you take a deep breath, and read my emails without trying to change their intention and meaning. If you think my emails were not useful, just ignore them, this is fine by me.
