Add an overview of DIGLIM to Documentation/security/diglim/introduction.rst and the architecture to Documentation/security/diglim/architecture.rst Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx> --- .../security/diglim/architecture.rst | 45 ++ Documentation/security/diglim/index.rst | 11 + .../security/diglim/introduction.rst | 631 ++++++++++++++++++ Documentation/security/index.rst | 1 + MAINTAINERS | 9 + 5 files changed, 697 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/security/diglim/architecture.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/security/diglim/index.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/security/diglim/introduction.rst diff --git a/Documentation/security/diglim/architecture.rst b/Documentation/security/diglim/architecture.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..a54fe2453715 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/security/diglim/architecture.rst @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +Architecture +============ + +This section introduces the high level architecture of DIGLIM. + +:: + + 5. add/delete from hash table and add refs to digest list + +---------------------------------------------+ + | +-----+ +-------------+ +--+ + | | key |-->| digest refs |-->...-->| | + V +-----+ +-------------+ +--+ + +-------------+ +-----+ +-------------+ + | digest list | | key |-->| digest refs | + | (compact) | +-----+ +-------------+ + +-------------+ +-----+ +-------------+ + ^ 4. copy to | key |-->| digest refs | + | kernel memory +-----+ +-------------+ kernel space + -------------------------------------------------------------------------- + ^ ^ user space + |<----------------+ 3b. upload | + +-------------+ +------------+ | 6. query digest + | digest list | | user space | 2b. convert + | (compact) | | parser | + +-------------+ +------------+ + 1a. upload ^ 1b. read + | + +------------+ + | RPM header | + +------------+ + + +As mentioned before, digest lists can be uploaded directly if they are in +the compact format (step 1a) or can be uploaded indirectly by the user +space parser if they are in an alternative format (steps 1b-3b). + +During upload, the kernel makes a copy of the digest list to the kernel +memory (step 4), and creates the necessary structures to index the digests +(hash table and a linked list of digest list references to locate the +digests in the digest list) (step 5). + +Finally, digests can be searched from user space through a securityfs file +(step 6) or by the kernel itself. diff --git a/Documentation/security/diglim/index.rst b/Documentation/security/diglim/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..0fc5ab019bc0 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/security/diglim/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +====================================== +Digest Lists Integrity Module (DIGLIM) +====================================== + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 1 + + introduction + architecture diff --git a/Documentation/security/diglim/introduction.rst b/Documentation/security/diglim/introduction.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d8d8b2a17222 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/security/diglim/introduction.rst @@ -0,0 +1,631 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +Introduction +============ + +Digest Lists Integrity Module (DIGLIM) is a new component added to the +integrity subsystem in the kernel, primarily aiming to aid Integrity +Measurement Architecture (IMA) in the process of checking the integrity of +file content and metadata. It accomplishes this task by storing reference +values coming from software vendors and by reporting whether or not the +digest of file content or metadata calculated by IMA (or EVM) is found +among those values. In this way, IMA can decide, depending on the result of +a query, if a measurement should be taken or access to the file should be +granted. The `Security Assumptions`_ section explains more in detail why +this component has been placed in the kernel. + +The main benefits of using IMA in conjunction with DIGLIM are the ability +to implement advanced remote attestation schemes based on the usage of a +TPM key for establishing a TLS secure channel [1][2], and to reduce the +burden on Linux distribution vendors to extend secure boot at OS level to +applications. + +DIGLIM does not have the complexity of feature-rich databases. In fact, its +main functionality comes from the hash table primitives already in the +kernel. It does not have an ad-hoc storage module, it just indexes data in +a fixed format (digest lists, a set of concatenated digests preceded by a +header), copied to kernel memory as they are. Lastly, it does not support +database-oriented languages such as SQL, but only accepts a digest and its +algorithm as a query. + +The only digest list format supported by DIGLIM is called ``compact``. +However, Linux distribution vendors don't have to generate new digest lists +in this format for the packages they release, as already available +information, such as RPM headers and DEB package metadata, can be already +used as a source for reference values (they already include file digests), +with a user space parser taking care of the conversion to the compact +format. + +Although one might perceive that storing file or metadata digests for a +Linux distribution would significantly increase the memory usage, this does +not seem to be the case. As an anticipation of the evaluation done in the +`Preliminary Performance Evaluation`_ section, protecting binaries and +shared libraries of a minimal Fedora 33 installation requires 208K of +memory for the digest lists plus 556K for indexing. + +In exchange for a slightly increased memory usage, DIGLIM improves the +performance of the integrity subsystem. In the considered scenario, IMA +measurement and appraisal with digest lists requires respectively less than +one quarter and less than half the time, compared to the current solution. + +DIGLIM also keeps track of whether digest lists have been processed in some +way (e.g. measured or appraised by IMA). This is important for example for +remote attestation, so that remote verifiers understand what has been +uploaded to the kernel. + +DIGLIM behaves like a transactional database, i.e. it has the ability to +roll back to the beginning of the transaction if an error occurred during +the addition of a digest list (the deletion operation always succeeds). +This capability has been tested with an ad-hoc fault injection mechanism +capable of simulating failures during the operations. + +Finally, DIGLIM exposes to user space, through securityfs, the digest lists +currently loaded, the number of digests added, a query interface and an +interface to set digest list labels. + +[1] LSS EU 2019 + +- slides: + https://static.sched.com/hosted_files/lsseu2019/bd/secure_attested_communication_channels_lss_eu_2019.pdf +- video: https://youtu.be/mffdQgkvDNY + +[2] FutureTPM EU project, final review meeting demo + +- slides: + https://futuretpm.eu/images/07-3-FutureTPM-Final-Review-Slides-WP6-Device-Management-Use-Case-HWDU.pdf +- video: https://vimeo.com/528251864/4c1d55abcd + + +Binary Integrity +---------------- + +Integrity is a fundamental security property in information systems. +Integrity could be described as the condition in which a generic +component is just after it has been released by the entity that created it. + +One way to check whether a component is in this condition (called binary +integrity) is to calculate its digest and to compare it with a reference +value (i.e. the digest calculated in controlled conditions, when the +component is released). + +IMA, a software part of the integrity subsystem, can perform such +evaluation and execute different actions: + +- store the digest in an integrity-protected measurement list, so that it + can be sent to a remote verifier for analysis; +- compare the calculated digest with a reference value (usually protected + with a signature) and deny operations if the file is found corrupted; +- store the digest in the system log. + + +Contribution +------------ + +DIGLIM further enhances the capabilities offered by IMA-based solutions +and, at the same time, makes them more practical to adopt by reusing +existing sources as reference values for integrity decisions. + +Possible sources for digest lists are: + +- RPM headers; +- Debian repository metadata. + + +Benefits for IMA Measurement +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +One of the issues that arises when files are measured by the OS is that, +due to parallel execution, the order in which file accesses happen cannot +be predicted. Since the TPM Platform Configuration Register (PCR) extend +operation, executed after each file measurement, cryptographically binds +the current measurement to the previous ones, the PCR value at the end of a +workload cannot be predicted too. + +Thus, even if the usage of a TPM key, bound to a PCR value, should be +allowed when only good files were accessed, the TPM could unexpectedly deny +an operation on that key if files accesses did not happen as stated by the +key policy (which allows only one of the possible sequences). + +DIGLIM solves this issue by making the PCR value stable over the time and +not dependent on file accesses. The following figure depicts the current +and the new approaches: + +:: + + IMA measurement list (current) + + entry# 1st boot 2nd boot 3rd boot + +----+---------------+ +----+---------------+ +----+---------------+ + 1: | 10 | file1 measur. | | 10 | file3 measur. | | 10 | file2 measur. | + +----+---------------+ +----+---------------+ +----+---------------+ + 2: | 10 | file2 measur. | | 10 | file2 measur. | | 10 | file3 measur. | + +----+---------------+ +----+---------------+ +----+---------------+ + 3: | 10 | file3 measur. | | 10 | file1 measur. | | 10 | file4 measur. | + +----+---------------+ +----+---------------+ +----+---------------+ + + PCR: Extend != Extend != Extend + file1, file2, file3 file3, file2, file1 file2, file3, file4 + + + PCR Extend definition: + + PCR(new value) = Hash(Hash(meas. entry), PCR(previous value)) + +A new entry in the measurement list is created by IMA for each file access. +Assuming that ``file1``, ``file2`` and ``file3`` are files provided by the +software vendor, ``file4`` is an unknown file, the first two PCR values +above represent a good system state, the third a bad system state. The PCR +values are the result of the PCR extend operation performed for each +measurement entry with the digest of the measurement entry as an input. + +:: + + IMA measurement list (with DIGLIM) + + dlist + +--------------+ + | header | + +--------------+ + | file1 digest | + | file2 digest | + | file3 digest | + +--------------+ + +``dlist`` is a digest list containing the digest of ``file1``, ``file2`` +and ``file3``. In the intended scenario, it is generated by a software +vendor at the end of the building process, and retrieved by the +administrator of the system where the digest list is loaded. + +:: + + entry# 1st boot 2nd boot 3rd boot + +----+---------------+ +----+---------------+ +----+---------------+ + 0: | 11 | dlist measur. | | 11 | dlist measur. | | 11 | dlist measur. | + +----+---------------+ +----+---------------+ +----+---------------+ + 1: < file1 measur. skip > < file3 measur. skip > < file2 measur. skip > + + 2: < file2 measur. skip > < file2 measur. skip > < file3 measur. skip > + +----+---------------+ + 3: < file3 measur. skip > < file1 measur. skip > | 11 | file4 measur. | + +----+---------------+ + + PCR: Extend = Extend != Extend + dlist dlist dlist, file4 + + +The first entry in the measurement list contains the digest of the digest +list uploaded to the kernel at kernel initialization time. + +When a file is accessed, IMA queries DIGLIM with the calculated file digest +and, if it is found, IMA skips the measurement. + +Thus, the only information sent to remote verifiers are: the list of +files that could possibly be accessed (from the digest list), but not if +they were accessed and when; the measurement of unknown files. + +Despite providing less information, this solution has the advantage that +the good system state (i.e. when only ``file1``, ``file2`` and ``file3`` +are accessed) now can be represented with a deterministic PCR value (the +PCR is extended only with the measurement of the digest list). Also, the +bad system state can still be distinguished from the good state (the PCR is +extended also with the measurement of ``file4``). + +If a TPM key is bound to the good PCR value, the TPM would allow the key to +be used if ``file1``, ``file2`` or ``file3`` are accessed, regardless of +the sequence in which they are accessed (the PCR value does not change), +and would revoke the permission when the unknown ``file4`` is accessed (the +PCR value changes). If a system is able to establish a TLS connection with +a peer, this implicitly means that the system was in a good state (i.e. +``file4`` was not accessed, otherwise the TPM would have denied the usage +of the TPM key due to the key policy). + + +Benefits for IMA Appraisal +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Extending secure boot to applications means being able to verify the +provenance of files accessed. IMA does it by verifying file signatures with +a key that it trusts, which requires Linux distribution vendors to +additionally include in the package header a signature for each file that +must be verified (there is the dedicated ``RPMTAG_FILESIGNATURES`` section +in the RPM header). + +The proposed approach would be instead to verify data provenance from +already available metadata (file digests) in existing packages. IMA would +verify the signature of package metadata and search file digests extracted +from package metadata and added to the hash table in the kernel. + +For RPMs, file digests can be found in the ``RPMTAG_FILEDIGESTS`` section +of ``RPMTAG_IMMUTABLE``, whose signature is in ``RPMTAG_RSAHEADER``. For +DEBs, file digests (unsafe to use due to a weak digest algorithm) can be +found in the ``md5sum`` file, which can be indirectly verified from +``Release.gpg``. + +The following figure highlights the differences between the current and the +proposed approach. + +:: + + IMA appraisal (current solution, with file signatures): + + appraise + +-----------+ + V | + +-------------------------+-----+ +-------+-----+ | + | RPM header | | ima rpm | file1 | sig | | + | ... | | plugin +-------+-----+ +-----+ + | file1 sig [to be added] | sig |--------> ... | IMA | + | ... | | +-------+-----+ +-----+ + | fileN sig [to be added] | | | fileN | sig | + +-------------------------+-----+ +-------+-----+ + +In this case, file signatures must be added to the RPM header, so that the +``ima`` rpm plugin can extract them together with the file content. The RPM +header signature is not used. + +:: + + IMA appraisal (with DIGLIM): + + kernel hash table + with RPM header content + +---+ +--------------+ + | |--->| file1 digest | + +---+ +--------------+ + ... + +---+ appraise (file1) + | | <--------------+ + +----------------+-----+ +---+ | + | RPM header | | ^ | + | ... | | digest_list | | + | file1 digest | sig | rpm plugin | +-------+ +-----+ + | ... | |-------------+--->| file1 | | IMA | + | fileN digest | | +-------+ +-----+ + +----------------+-----+ | + ^ | + +------------------------------------+ + appraise (RPM header) + +In this case, the RPM header is used as it is, and its signature is used +for IMA appraisal. Then, the ``digest_list`` rpm plugin executes the user +space parser to parse the RPM header and add the extracted digests to an +hash table in the kernel. IMA appraisal of the files in the RPM package +consists in searching their digest in the hash table. + +Other than reusing available information as digest list, another advantage +is the lower computational overhead compared to the solution with file +signatures (only one signature verification for many files and digest +lookup, instead of per file signature verification, see `Preliminary +Performance Evaluation`_ for more details). + + +Lifecycle +--------- + +The lifecycle of DIGLIM is represented in the following figure: + +:: + + Vendor premises (release process with modifications): + + +------------+ +-----------------------+ +------------------------+ + | 1. build a | | 2. generate and sign | | 3. publish the package | + | package |-->| a digest list from |-->| and digest list in | + | | | packaged files | | a repository | + +------------+ +-----------------------+ +------------------------+ + | + | + User premises: | + V + +---------------------+ +------------------------+ +-----------------+ + | 6. use digest lists | | 5. download the digest | | 4. download and | + | for measurement |<--| list and upload to |<--| install the | + | and/or appraisal | | the kernel | | package | + +---------------------+ +------------------------+ +-----------------+ + +The figure above represents all the steps when a digest list is +generated separately. However, as mentioned in `Contribution`_, in most +cases existing packages can be already used as a source for digest lists, +limiting the effort for software vendors. + +If, for example, RPMs are used as a source for digest lists, the figure +above becomes: + +:: + + Vendor premises (release process without modifications): + + +------------+ +------------------------+ + | 1. build a | | 2. publish the package | + | package |-->| in a repository |---------------------+ + | | | | | + +------------+ +------------------------+ | + | + | + User premises: | + V + +---------------------+ +------------------------+ +-----------------+ + | 5. use digest lists | | 4. extract digest list | | 3. download and | + | for measurement |<--| from the package |<--| install the | + | and/or appraisal | | and upload to the | | package | + | | | kernel | | | + +---------------------+ +------------------------+ +-----------------+ + +Step 4 can be performed with the ``digest_list`` rpm plugin and the user +space parser, without changes to rpm itself. + + +Security Assumptions +-------------------- + +As mentioned in the `Introduction`_, DIGLIM will be primarily used in +conjunction with IMA to enforce a mandatory policy on all user space +processes, including those owned by root. Even root, in a system with a +locked-down kernel, cannot affect the enforcement of the mandatory policy +or, if changes are permitted, it cannot do so without being detected. + +Given that the target of the enforcement are user space processes, DIGLIM +cannot be placed in the target, as a Mandatory Access Control (MAC) design +is required to have the components responsible to enforce the mandatory +policy separated from the target. + +While locking-down a system and limiting actions with a mandatory policy is +generally perceived by users as an obstacle, it has noteworthy benefits for +the users themselves. + +First, it would timely block attempts by malicious software to steal or +misuse user assets. Although users could query the package managers to +detect them, detection would happen after the fact, or it wouldn't happen +at all if the malicious software tampered with package managers. With a +mandatory policy enforced by the kernel, users would still be able to +decide which software they want to be executed except that, unlike package +managers, the kernel is not affected by user space processes or root. + +Second, it might make systems more easily verifiable from outside, due to +the limited actions the system allows. When users connect to a server, not +only they would be able to verify the server identity, which is already +possible with communication protocols like TLS, but also if the software +running on that server can be trusted to handle their sensitive data. + + +Adoption +-------- + +A former version of DIGLIM is used in the following OSes: + +- openEuler 20.09 + https://github.com/openeuler-mirror/kernel/tree/openEuler-20.09 + +- openEuler 21.03 + https://github.com/openeuler-mirror/kernel/tree/openEuler-21.03 + +Originally, DIGLIM was part of IMA (known as IMA Digest Lists). In this +version, it has been redesigned as a standalone module with an API that +makes its functionality accessible by IMA and, eventually, other +subsystems. + +User Space Support +------------------ + +Digest lists can be generated and managed with ``digest-list-tools``: + +https://github.com/openeuler-mirror/digest-list-tools + +It includes two main applications: + +- ``gen_digest_lists``: generates digest lists from files in the + filesystem or from the RPM database (more digest list sources can be + supported); +- ``manage_digest_lists``: converts and uploads digest lists to the + kernel. + +Integration with rpm is done with the ``digest_list`` plugin: + +https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/rpm/blob/master/Add-digest-list-plugin.patch + +This plugin writes the RPM header and its signature to a file, so that the +file is ready to be appraised by IMA, and calls the user space parser to +convert and upload the digest list to the kernel. + + +Simple Usage Example (Tested with Fedora 33) +-------------------------------------------- + +1. Digest list generation (RPM headers and their signature are copied to + the specified directory): + +.. code-block:: bash + + # mkdir /etc/digest_lists + # gen_digest_lists -t file -f rpm+db -d /etc/digest_lists -o add + +2. Digest list upload with the user space parser: + +.. code-block:: bash + + # manage_digest_lists -p add-digest -d /etc/digest_lists + +3. First digest list query: + +.. code-block:: bash + + # echo sha256-$(sha256sum /bin/cat) > /sys/kernel/security/integrity/diglim/digest_query + # cat /sys/kernel/security/integrity/diglim/digest_query + sha256-[...]-0-file_list-rpm-coreutils-8.32-18.fc33.x86_64 (actions: 0): version: 1, algo: sha256, type: 2, modifiers: 1, count: 106, datalen: 3392 + +4. Second digest list query: + +.. code-block:: bash + + # echo sha256-$(sha256sum /bin/zip) > /sys/kernel/security/integrity/diglim/digest_query + # cat /sys/kernel/security/integrity/diglim/digest_query + sha256-[...]-0-file_list-rpm-zip-3.0-27.fc33.x86_64 (actions: 0): version: 1, algo: sha256, type: 2, modifiers: 1, count: 4, datalen: 128 + + +Preliminary Performance Evaluation +---------------------------------- + +This section provides an initial estimation of the overhead introduced by +DIGLIM. The estimation has been performed on a Fedora 33 virtual machine +with 1447 packages installed. The virtual machine has 16 vCPU (host CPU: +AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores) and 2G of RAM (host memory: +64G). The virtual machine also has a vTPM with libtpms and swtpm as +backend. + +After writing the RPM headers to files, the size of the directory +containing them is 36M. + +After converting the RPM headers to the compact digest list, the size of +the data being uploaded to the kernel is 3.6M. + +The time to load the entire RPM database is 0.628s. + +After loading the digest lists to the kernel, the slab usage due to +indexing is (obtained with slab_nomerge in the kernel command line): + +:: + + OBJS ACTIVE USE OBJ SIZE SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME + 118144 118144 100% 0,03K 923 128 3692K digest_list_item_ref_cache + 102400 102400 100% 0,03K 800 128 3200K digest_item_cache + 2646 2646 100% 0,09K 63 42 252K digest_list_item_cache + +The stats, obtained from the ``digests_count`` interface, introduced later, +are: + +:: + + Parser digests: 0 + File digests: 99100 + Metadata digests: 0 + Digest list digests: 1423 + +On this installation, this would be the worst case in which all files are +measured and/or appraised, which is currently not recommended without +enforcing an integrity policy protecting mutable files. Infoflow LSM is a +component to accomplish this task: + +https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-integrity/cover/20190818235745.1417-1-roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx/ + +The first manageable goal of IMA with DIGLIM is to use an execution policy, +with measurement and/or appraisal of files executed or mapped in memory as +executable (in addition to kernel modules and firmware). In this +case, the digest list contains the digest only for those files. The numbers +above change as follows. + +After converting the RPM headers to the compact digest list, the size of +the data being uploaded to the kernel is 208K. + +The time to load the digest of binaries and shared libraries is 0.062s. + +After loading the digest lists to the kernel, the slab usage due to +indexing is: + +:: + + OBJS ACTIVE USE OBJ SIZE SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME + 7168 7168 100% 0,03K 56 128 224K digest_list_item_ref_cache + 7168 7168 100% 0,03K 56 128 224K digest_item_cache + 1134 1134 100% 0,09K 27 42 108K digest_list_item_cache + + +The stats, obtained from the ``digests_count`` interface, are: + +:: + + Parser digests: 0 + File digests: 5986 + Metadata digests: 0 + Digest list digests: 1104 + + +Comparison with IMA +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +This section compares the performance between the current solution for IMA +measurement and appraisal, and IMA with DIGLIM. + + +Workload A (without DIGLIM): + +#. cat file[0-5985] > /dev/null + + +Workload B (with DIGLIM): + +#. echo $PWD/0-file_list-compact-file[0-1103] > <securityfs>/integrity/diglim/digest_list_add +#. cat file[0-5985] > /dev/null + + +Workload A execution time without IMA policy: + +:: + + real 0m0,155s + user 0m0,008s + sys 0m0,066s + + +Measurement +........... + +IMA policy: + +:: + + measure fowner=2000 func=FILE_CHECK mask=MAY_READ use_diglim=allow pcr=11 ima_template=ima-sig + +``use_diglim`` is a policy keyword not yet supported by IMA. + + +Workload A execution time with IMA and 5986 files with signature measured: + +:: + + real 0m8,273s + user 0m0,008s + sys 0m2,537s + + +Workload B execution time with IMA, 1104 digest lists with signature +measured and uploaded to the kernel, and 5986 files with signature accessed +but not measured (due to the file digest being found in the hash table): + +:: + + real 0m1,837s + user 0m0,036s + sys 0m0,583s + + +Appraisal +......... + +IMA policy: + +:: + + appraise fowner=2000 func=FILE_CHECK mask=MAY_READ use_diglim=allow + +``use_diglim`` is a policy keyword not yet supported by IMA. + + +Workload A execution time with IMA and 5986 files with file signature +appraised: + +:: + + real 0m2,197s + user 0m0,011s + sys 0m2,022s + + +Workload B execution time with IMA, 1104 digest lists with signature +appraised and uploaded to the kernel, and with 5986 files with signature +not verified (due to the file digest being found in the hash table): + +:: + + real 0m0,982s + user 0m0,020s + sys 0m0,865s diff --git a/Documentation/security/index.rst b/Documentation/security/index.rst index 16335de04e8c..6c3aea41c55b 100644 --- a/Documentation/security/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/security/index.rst @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ Security Documentation tpm/index digsig landlock + diglim/index diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 6c8be735cc91..c914dadd7e65 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -5452,6 +5452,15 @@ L: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx S: Maintained F: drivers/gpio/gpio-gpio-mm.c +DIGLIM +M: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx> +L: linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +S: Supported +T: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zohar/linux-integrity.git +F: Documentation/security/diglim/architecture.rst +F: Documentation/security/diglim/index.rst +F: Documentation/security/diglim/introduction.rst + DIOLAN U2C-12 I2C DRIVER M: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> L: linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- 2.25.1
