Re: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Fix kvm_check_cap() assertion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15/06/21 17:04, Fuad Tabba wrote:
KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION ioctl can return any negative value on error,
and not necessarily -1. Change the assertion to reflect that.

Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
index 5c70596dd1b9..a2b732cf96ea 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ int kvm_check_cap(long cap)
kvm_fd = open_kvm_dev_path_or_exit();
  	ret = ioctl(kvm_fd, KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION, cap);
-	TEST_ASSERT(ret != -1, "KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION IOCTL failed,\n"
+	TEST_ASSERT(ret >= 0, "KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION IOCTL failed,\n"
  		"  rc: %i errno: %i", ret, errno);
close(kvm_fd);


Queued, thanks.

Paolo




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux