Re: [PATCHv8] exec: Fix dead-lock in de_thread with ptrace_attach

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:31:42 +0200 Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> This introduces signal->unsafe_execve_in_progress,
>> which is used to fix the case when at least one of the
>> sibling threads is traced, and therefore the trace
>> process may dead-lock in ptrace_attach, but de_thread
>> will need to wait for the tracer to continue execution.
>
> Deadlocks are serious.  Is this exploitable by unprivileged userspace?

The processes are killable so I don't think this is the serious in the
way you mean.  In fact Linus has already said that it is not a deadlock.

Eric



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux