On 4/22/21 12:00 PM, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
Fix the following coccicheck warning:
./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c:76:15-16: WARNING
comparing pointer to 0.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
How many more of those 'comparing pointer to 0' patches do you have?
Right now we already merged the following with similar trivial pattern:
- ebda107e5f222a086c83ddf6d1ab1da97dd15810
- a9c80b03e586fd3819089fbd33c38fb65ad5e00c
- 04ea63e34a2ee85cfd38578b3fc97b2d4c9dd573
Given they don't really 'fix' anything, I would like to reduce such
patch cleanup churn on the bpf tree. Please _consolidate_ all other
such occurrences into a _single_ patch for BPF selftests, and resubmit.
Thanks!
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c
index 52a550d..d4247d6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test7, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test8")
int BPF_PROG(test8, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
{
- if (arg->a == 0)
+ if (!arg->a)
test8_result = 1;
return 0;
}
