On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 12:55 PM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Currently running tests via KUnit tool means tweaking a .kunitconfig > file, which you'd keep around locally and never commit. > This changes makes it so users can pass in a path to a kunitconfig. > > One of the imagined use cases is having kunitconfig fragments in-tree > to formalize interesting sets of tests for features/subsystems, e.g. > $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunticonfig=fs/ext4/kunitconfig > > For now, this hypothetical fs/ext4/kunitconfig would contain > CONFIG_KUNIT=y > CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y > CONFIG_EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS=y > > At the moment, it's not hard to manually whip up this file, but as more > and more tests get added, this will get tedious. > > It also opens the door to documenting how to run all the tests relevant > to a specific subsystem or feature as a simple one-liner. > > This can be seen as an analogue to tools/testing/selftests/*/config > But in the case of KUnit, the tests live in the same directory as the > code-under-test, so it feels more natural to allow the kunitconfig > fragments to live anywhere. (Though, people could create a separate > directory if wanted; this patch imposes no restrictions on the path). > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
