From: Andy Shevchenko
> Sent: 05 February 2021 12:51
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 1:35 PM Richard Fitzgerald
> <rf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 04/02/2021 16:35, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Wed 2021-02-03 21:45:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 04:50:07PM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > >>> + for (; max_chars > 0; max_chars--) {
> > >>
> > >> Less fragile is to write
> > >>
> > >> while (max_chars--)
> > >
> > > Except that the original was more obvious at least for me.
> > > I always prefer more readable code when the compiler might do
> > > the optimization easily. But this is my personal taste.
> > > I am fine with both variants.
>
> I *slightly* prefer while-loop *in this case* due to less characters
> to parse to understand the logic.
The two loops are also have different values for 'max_chars'
inside the loop body.
If 'max_chars' is known to be non-zero the do ... while (--max_chars);
loop will probable generate better code.
But there is no accounting for just how odd some decisions gcc
makes are.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
