On 2/5/21 2:58 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 11:11:57AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:+static inline u32 seqnum32_inc(struct seqnum32 *seq) +{ + atomic_t val = ATOMIC_INIT(seq->seqnum); + + seq->seqnum = (u32) atomic_inc_return(&val); + if (seq->seqnum >= UINT_MAX) + pr_info("Sequence Number overflow %u detected\n", + seq->seqnum); + return seq->seqnum;As Peter points out, this is doing doing what you think it is doing :( Why do you not just have seq->seqnum be a real atomic variable? Trying to switch to/from one like this does not work as there is no "atomic-ness" happening here at all.
Yes. This is sloppy on my part. As Peter and Rafael also pointed. I have to start paying more attention to my inner voice. thanks, -- Shuah
