This test expects fds to have specific values, which works fine when the test is run standalone. However, the kselftest runner consumes a couple of extra fds for redirection when running tests, so the test fails when run via kselftest. Change the test to pass on any valid fd number. Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index 26c72f2b61b1..9338df6f4ca8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -4019,18 +4019,14 @@ TEST(user_notification_addfd) /* Verify we can set an arbitrary remote fd */ fd = ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd); - /* - * The child has fds 0(stdin), 1(stdout), 2(stderr), 3(memfd), - * 4(listener), so the newly allocated fd should be 5. - */ - EXPECT_EQ(fd, 5); + EXPECT_GE(fd, 0); EXPECT_EQ(filecmp(getpid(), pid, memfd, fd), 0); /* Verify we can set an arbitrary remote fd with large size */ memset(&big, 0x0, sizeof(big)); big.addfd = addfd; fd = ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD_BIG, &big); - EXPECT_EQ(fd, 6); + EXPECT_GE(fd, 0); /* Verify we can set a specific remote fd */ addfd.newfd = 42; -- 2.29.2
