On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:59 PM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > usage.rst goes into a detailed section about faking out classes, but > currently lacks wording about how one might idiomatically test a range > of inputs. > > Add a new chapter for "Common Patterns" and group "Isolating behvaior" > and this new section under there. > > Give an example of how one might test a hash function via macros/helper > funcs and a table-driven test and very briefly discuss pros and cons. > > Also highlight the KUNIT_EXPECT_*_MSG() variants (that aren't mentioned > elsewhere [1]) which are particularly useful in these situations. > > It is also criminally underused at the moment, only appearing in 2 > tests (both written by people involved in KUnit). > > [1] not even on > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.html > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
