On 11/25/20 9:47 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:37:18 -0700 David Ahern wrote: >> On 11/24/20 6:58 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >>> But it's generally not a huge issue for applying the patch. I just like >>> to see the build bot result, to make sure we're not adding W=1 C=1 >>> warnings. >> >> ah, the build bot part is new. got it. > > BTW I was wondering for the longest time how to structure things so > that build bot can also build iproute2 in case we want to run tests > attached to the series and the tests depend on iproute2 changes... > > But let's cross that bridge when we get there. > Why not cross it now? You handled the switch over to new a patchworks with a build bot, so we can take advantage of automation. Seems like the bot needs to detect 'net', 'net-next', 'bpf' and 'bpf-next' as they are all different trees for the kernel patches. iproute2 is just another tree, so it should be able to put those in a different bucket for automated builds - even if it means a 'set' crosses trees.
