On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 08:21, David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 1:41 PM Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Implementation of support for parameterized testing in KUnit. This > > approach requires the creation of a test case using the > > KUNIT_CASE_PARAM() macro that accepts a generator function as input. > > > > This generator function should return the next parameter given the > > previous parameter in parameterized tests. It also provides a macro to > > generate common-case generators based on arrays. Generators may also > > optionally provide a human-readable description of parameters, which is > > displayed where available. > > > > Note, currently the result of each parameter run is displayed in > > diagnostic lines, and only the overall test case output summarizes > > TAP-compliant success or failure of all parameter runs. In future, when > > supported by kunit-tool, these can be turned into subsubtest outputs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@xxxxxxxxx> > > Co-developed-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > [Resending this because my email client re-defaulted to HTML! Aarrgh!] > > This looks good to me! I tested it in UML and x86-64 w/ KASAN, and > both worked fine. > > Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> Thank you! > Thanks for sticking with this! Will these patches be landing in 5.11 or 5.12? > -- David Thanks, -- Marco
