[PATCH] selftests/seccomp: sh: Fix register names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It looks like the seccomp selftests were never actually built for sh.
This fixes it, though I don't have an environment to do a runtime test
of it yet.

Fixes: 0bb605c2c7f2b4b3 ("sh: Add SECCOMP_FILTER")
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 7f7ecfcd66db..26c72f2b61b1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -1804,8 +1804,8 @@ TEST_F(TRACE_poke, getpid_runs_normally)
 #define SYSCALL_RET(_regs)	(_regs).a[(_regs).windowbase * 4 + 2]
 #elif defined(__sh__)
 # define ARCH_REGS		struct pt_regs
-# define SYSCALL_NUM(_regs)	(_regs).gpr[3]
-# define SYSCALL_RET(_regs)	(_regs).gpr[0]
+# define SYSCALL_NUM(_regs)	(_regs).regs[3]
+# define SYSCALL_RET(_regs)	(_regs).regs[0]
 #else
 # error "Do not know how to find your architecture's registers and syscalls"
 #endif
-- 
2.25.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux