Hi Jakub, On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:40:10 -0800 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:40:36 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > agreed. The v6 variant has existed for a while. The v4 version is > > > independent. > > > > Okay, I'm not sure what's the right call so I asked DaveM. > > DaveM raised a concern that unless we implement v6 now we can't be sure > the interface we create for v4 is going to fit there. > > So Andrea unless it's a major hurdle, could you take a stab at the v6 > version with VRFs as part of this series? I can tackle the v6 version but how do we face the compatibility issue raised by Stefano in his message? if it is ok to implement a uAPI that breaks the existing scripts, it is relatively easy to replicate the VRF-based approach also in v6. Waiting for your advice! Thanks, Andrea
