On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 02:08:34PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Follow new file name convention for the KUnit tests.
> Since we have lib/*test*.c in a few variations,
> use 'kunit' suffix to distinguish usual test cases
> with KUnit-based ones.
Can we get this applied?
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v3: added Rb (David), expanded Cc (Mark)
> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> lib/Makefile | 2 +-
> lib/{list-test.c => list_kunit.c} | 0
> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> rename lib/{list-test.c => list_kunit.c} (100%)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 4538378de6f5..20facbca9388 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -10188,7 +10188,7 @@ M: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
> L: linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> L: kunit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> S: Maintained
> -F: lib/list-test.c
> +F: lib/list_kunit.c
>
> LIVE PATCHING
> M: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
> index 5ca03ba6ee45..1a5e6a6ebe8d 100644
> --- a/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/Makefile
> @@ -350,6 +350,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PLDMFW) += pldmfw/
>
> # KUnit tests
> obj-$(CONFIG_BITFIELD_KUNIT) += bitfield_kunit.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list-test.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list_kunit.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LINEAR_RANGES_TEST) += test_linear_ranges.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_BITS_TEST) += test_bits.o
> diff --git a/lib/list-test.c b/lib/list_kunit.c
> similarity index 100%
> rename from lib/list-test.c
> rename to lib/list_kunit.c
> --
> 2.28.0
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
