Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Sep 23 2020 at 13:49, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 04:18:26PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: >>> Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> Yes, we can, and I'm happy to follow up with that as part of my TIF >>> clean up work, but can we not block the current patchset to be merged >>> waiting for that, as this already grew a lot from the original feature >>> submission? >> >> In that case, I'd say just add the new TIF flag. The consolidation can >> come later. > > No. This is exactly the wrong order. Cleanup and consolidation have > precedence over features. I'm tired of 'we'll do that later' songs, > simply because in the very end I'm going to be the idiot who mops up the > resulting mess. > No problem. I will follow up with a patchset consolidating those flags into this syscall_intercept interface I proposed. I assume there is no immediate concerns with the consolidation approach itself. -- Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
