Re: [PATCH 11/15] selftests/seccomp: Remove SYSCALL_NUM_RET_SHARE_REG in favor of SYSCALL_RET_SET

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 04:08:16AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Instead of special-casing the specific case of shared registers, create
> a default SYSCALL_RET_SET() macro (mirroring SYSCALL_NUM_SET()), that
> writes to the SYSCALL_RET register. For architectures that can't set the
> return value (for whatever reason), they can define SYSCALL_RET_SET()
> without an associated SYSCALL_RET() macro. This also paves the way for
> architectures that need to do special things to set the return value
> (e.g. powerpc).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Looks good!
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux