Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] bpf/libbpf: BTF support for typed ksyms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 4:55 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 1:35 PM Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 11:11 AM Andrii Nakryiko
> > <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:29 PM Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 3:37 PM Andrii Nakryiko
> > > > <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:42 PM Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If a ksym is defined with a type, libbpf will try to find the ksym's btf
> > > > > > information from kernel btf. If a valid btf entry for the ksym is found,
> > > > > > libbpf can pass in the found btf id to the verifier, which validates the
> > > > > > ksym's type and value.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Typeless ksyms (i.e. those defined as 'void') will not have such btf_id,
> > > > > > but it has the symbol's address (read from kallsyms) and its value is
> > > > > > treated as a raw pointer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > > > > > index 4a81c6b2d21b..94eff612c7c2 100644
> > > > > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > > > > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > > > > > @@ -357,7 +357,16 @@ struct extern_desc {
> > > > > >                         bool is_signed;
> > > > > >                 } kcfg;
> > > > > >                 struct {
> > > > > > -                       unsigned long long addr;
> > > > > > +                       /*
> > > > > > +                        *  1. If ksym is typeless, the field 'addr' is valid.
> > > > > > +                        *  2. If ksym is typed, the field 'vmlinux_btf_id' is
> > > > > > +                        *     valid.
> > > > > > +                        */
> > > > > > +                       bool is_typeless;
> > > > > > +                       union {
> > > > > > +                               unsigned long long addr;
> > > > > > +                               int vmlinux_btf_id;
> > > > > > +                       };
> > > > >
> > > > > ksym is 16 bytes anyways, union doesn't help to save space. I propose
> > > > > to encode all this with just two fields: vmlinux_btf_id and addr. If
> > > > > btf_id == 0, then extern is typeless.
> > > >
> > > > Ack on expanding the union. But I slightly preferred keeping
> > > > is_typeless. IIUC, btf_id points a VAR_KIND, we need the following
> > > > pointer chasing every time
> > > >
> > > > t = btf__type_by_id(obj->btf, ext->btf_id);
> > > > t->type;
> > > >
> > > > which I felt is worse than keeping a is_typeless flag.
> > >
> > > Sorry, I'm not following. In all places where you would check
> > > sym->is_typeless, you'd now just do:
> > >
> > > if (ext->ksym.vmlinux_btf_id) {
> > >   /* typed, use ext->ksym.vmlinux_btf_id */
> > > } else {
> > >   /* typeless */
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > My apologies, I should be more specific.
> >
> > 'vmlinux_btf_id' gets its value in bpf_object__resolve_ksyms_btf_id().
> > Before we call this function, there are three places that need to tell
> > whether a ksym is typed, currently in v1. Specifically,
> >
> >  - in bpf_object__collect_externs(), typeless ksyms are rewritten as
> > 'int', in contrast, typed ones are left untouched (though this may
> > change in v2).
> >  - bpf_object__load_vmlinux_btf() now is called before
> > bpf_object__resolve_ksyms_btf_id(). In v1's design, if there is no
> > typed ksym, we could skip loading vmlinux_btf potentially.
> >  - even bpf_object__resolve_ksyms_btf_id() itself is conditionally
> > called, depending on whether there is any typed ksym.
> >
> > At the time when these places are called, vmlinux_btf_id is
> > unavailable and we can't use it for the purpose of telling whether a
> > ksym is typed.
> >
> > However, rather than vmlinux_btf_id, there may be an alternative. We
> > can record the ksym extern's type's btf_id and use that as
> > 'is_typeless' flag. This also solves the problem below.
>
> Oh, I was thinking that vmlinux_btf_id contains a local BTF ID this
> whole time (clearly ignoring the "vmlinux_" part).
>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > > >                 } else {
> > > > > >                         pr_warn("unrecognized extern section '%s'\n", sec_name);
> > > > > >                         return -ENOTSUP;
> > > > > > @@ -2992,9 +3006,9 @@ static int bpf_object__collect_externs(struct bpf_object *obj)
> > > > > >         /* sort externs by type, for kcfg ones also by (align, size, name) */
> > > > > >         qsort(obj->externs, obj->nr_extern, sizeof(*ext), cmp_externs);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -       /* for .ksyms section, we need to turn all externs into allocated
> > > > > > -        * variables in BTF to pass kernel verification; we do this by
> > > > > > -        * pretending that each extern is a 8-byte variable
> > > > > > +       /* for .ksyms section, we need to turn all typeless externs into
> > > > > > +        * allocated variables in BTF to pass kernel verification; we do
> > > > > > +        * this by pretending that each typeless extern is a 8-byte variable
> > > > > >          */
> > > > > >         if (ksym_sec) {
> > > > > >                 /* find existing 4-byte integer type in BTF to use for fake
> > > > > > @@ -3012,7 +3026,7 @@ static int bpf_object__collect_externs(struct bpf_object *obj)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >                 sec = ksym_sec;
> > > > > >                 n = btf_vlen(sec);
> > > > > > -               for (i = 0, off = 0; i < n; i++, off += sizeof(int)) {
> > > > > > +               for (i = 0, off = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > > > > >                         struct btf_var_secinfo *vs = btf_var_secinfos(sec) + i;
> > > > > >                         struct btf_type *vt;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -3025,9 +3039,14 @@ static int bpf_object__collect_externs(struct bpf_object *obj)
> > > > > >                                 return -ESRCH;
> > > > > >                         }
> > > > > >                         btf_var(vt)->linkage = BTF_VAR_GLOBAL_ALLOCATED;
> > > > > > -                       vt->type = int_btf_id;
> > > > > > +                       if (ext->ksym.is_typeless) {
> > > > > > +                               vt->type = int_btf_id;
> > > > > > +                               vs->size = sizeof(int);
> > > > > > +                       }
> > > > > >                         vs->offset = off;
> > > > > > -                       vs->size = sizeof(int);
> > > > > > +                       off += vs->size;
> > > > > > +                       pr_debug("ksym var_secinfo: var '%s', type #%d, size %d, offset %d\n",
> > > > > > +                                ext->name, vt->type, vs->size, vs->offset);
> > > > >
> > > > > It's a bit of a waste that we still allocate memory for those typed
> > > > > ksym externs, as they don't really need space. But modifying BTF is a
> > > > > pain right now, so I think we'll have to do it, until we have a better
> > > > > BTF API. But let's make them integers for now to take a fixed and
> > > > > small amount of space.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do you mean making typed ksym externs of type integer? If so, we can't
> > > > do that, I think. After collect_externs, we later need to compare the
> > > > declared extern's type against the type defined in kernel. Better not
> > > > rewrite their types in BTf.
> > >
> > > Then maybe we need to make btf_id to point to the actual type of the
> > > variable, not BTF_KIND_VAR? Or just additionally record type's btf_id,
> > > not sure which one makes more sense at the moment.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I am generally against modifying BTF. I initially didn't notice that
> > > > all the ksym externs' types are modified to 'int' and the type
> > > > comparison I mentioned above always failed. I dumped the btf in
> > > > vmlinux and the btf in object file, checked the kernel variable's
> > > > source code, printed out everything I could. The experience was very
> > > > bad.
> > > >
> > >
> > > It might be confusing, I agree, but the alternative is just a waste of
> > > memory just to match the BTF definition of a DATASEC, which describes
> > > externs. It seems sloppy to allocate a bunch of unused memory just to
> > > match the kernel's variable size, while in reality we either use 8
> > > bytes used (for typeless externs, storing ksym address) or none (for
> > > typed externs).
> > >
> > > Another alternative is to not specify BTF ID for .ksyms map, but it's
> > > not great for typeless externs case, as we are losing all type info
> > > completely. Trade-offs...
> > >
> >
> > I see. It looks like rewriting all ksym externs' type to integers is
> > the most straightforward solution here, though I felt a bit hacky.
> >
> > I can record the btf_id of the var's type before rewriting, so
> > bpf_core_type_are_compat() can find the true type for comparison. One
> > good thing about recording the type's btf_id is that it can be used to
> > tell whether the ksym extern is typed or not, before vmlinux_btf_id
>
> that's what I've been getting at, but I missed that vmlinux_btf_id is
> kernel BTF type ID. So let's record both local and target BTF type IDs
> and use local_btf_id as an indicator of typed vs typeless?
>

Yup, that sounds great!

[...]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux