On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 01:52:55PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:54:42AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Then we at least have a little clue wtf the thing does.. Yes I started > > with a rename and then got annoyed at the implementation too. > > On the code I think this is fair. I've also updated the calling function to be > a bit cleaner as well. > > However, I think the name 'update' is a bit misleading. Here is the new > calling code: > > ... > pkru = read_pkru(); > pkru = update_pkey_reg(pkru, pkey, init_val); > write_pkru(pkru); > ... > > > I think it is odd to have a function called update_pkey_reg() called right > before a write_pkru(). Can we call this update_pkey_value? or just 'val'? > Because write_pkru() actually updates the register. Fair enough, update_pkey_val() works fine for me.
