On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 01:25:43PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:22:34PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 01:04:38PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 03:31:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: > > > > This is v4 of Syscall User Redirection. The implementation itself is > > > > not modified from v3, it only applies the latest round of reviews to the > > > > selftests. > > > > > > > > __NR_syscalls is not really exported in header files other than > > > > asm-generic for every architecture, so it felt safer to optionally > > > > expose it with a fallback to a high value. > > > > > > > > Also, I didn't expose tests for PR_GET as that is not currently > > > > implemented. If possible, I'd have it supported by a future patchset, > > > > since it is not immediately necessary to support this feature. > > > > > > Thanks! That all looks good to me. > > > > Don't have any problem with this but did this ever get exposure on > > linux-api? This is the first time I see this pop up. > > I thought I'd added it to CC in the past, but that might have been other > recent unrelated threads. Does this need a full repost there too, you > think? Nah, wasn't my intention to force a repost. Seems that several people have looked this over. :) Just curious why it didn't get to linux-api and we know quite some people who only do look at linux-api (for sanity). :) Christian
