[PATCH for-next/seccomp v2 2/2] selftests/seccomp: Set NNP for TSYNC ESRCH flag test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The TSYNC ESRCH flag test will fail for regular users because NNP was
not set yet. Add NNP setting.

Fixes: 51891498f2da ("seccomp: allow TSYNC and USER_NOTIF together")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 14b038361549..0d29114123fa 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -3257,6 +3257,11 @@ TEST(user_notification_with_tsync)
 	int ret;
 	unsigned int flags;
 
+	ret = prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0);
+	ASSERT_EQ(0, ret) {
+		TH_LOG("Kernel does not support PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS!");
+	}
+
 	/* these were exclusive */
 	flags = SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER |
 		SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC;
-- 
2.25.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux