On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 06:19:34AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Calling ksft_exit_* results in executing fewer tests than planned, which > is wrong for ksft_exit_skip or suboptimal (because it results in a bail > out) for ksft_exit_fail_msg. > > Using ksft_test_result_skip instead skips only one test and lets the > test plan proceed as promised by ksft_set_plan. > > Paolo Thanks for fixing this, Paolo! Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> Shuah, want me to take it or do you want to take it?
