On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 04:23:09PM -0700, Scott Branden wrote: > Add FIRMWARE_PARTIAL_READ support for integrity > measurement on partial reads of firmware files. Hi, Several versions ago I'd suggested that the LSM infrastructure handle the "full read" semantics so that individual LSMs don't need to each duplicate the same efforts. As it happens, only IMA is impacted (SELinux ignores everything except modules, and LoadPin only cares about origin not contents). Next is the problem that enum kernel_read_file_id is an object TYPE enum, not a HOW enum. (And it seems I missed the addition of READING_FIRMWARE_PREALLOC_BUFFER, which may share a similar problem.) That it's a partial read doesn't change _what_ you're reading: that's an internal API detail. What happens when I attempt to do a partial read of a kexec image? I'll use kernel_pread_file() and pass READING_KEXEC_IMAGE, but the LSMs will have no idea it's a partial read. Finally, what keeps the contents of the file from changing between the first call (which IMA will read the entire file for) and the next reads which will bypass IMA? I'd suggested that the open file must have writes disabled on it (as execve() does). So, please redesign this: - do not add an enum - make the file unwritable for the life of having the handle open - make the "full read" happen as part of the first partial read so the LSMs don't have to reimplement everything -Kees -- Kees Cook
