On 6/9/20 11:55 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
Hi Shuah,
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:41:27 -0600
Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6/2/20 8:40 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
Convert the required tracefs interface checking code with
requires: list.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v2: Fix trigger-onchange-action-hist.tc requires list.
Masami,
This patch doesn't apply to linux-kselftest next
Patches 1-3 applied fine and this one failed. For now I will
hold off on applying this series.
Yes, there is another patch posted by Tom with his ftrace enhancement
in tracing-next. Thus I commented on 0/7 as below.
Sorry I made a note of it when I first looked at the series and
missed that when I was applying patches.
----
Since this series depends on following 2 commits,
commit 619ee76f5c9f ("selftests/ftrace: Return unsupported if no
error_log file") on Shuah's Kselftest tree
commit bea24f766efc ("selftests/ftrace: Distinguish between hist
and synthetic event checks") on Steven's Tracing tree
This can be applied on the tree which merged both of them.
----
I'm not sure how do I handle it. It is OK just modifying this
for linux-kselftest, but in that case we will need another
patch after merged both.
IMHO, since the kselftest must run correctly on older kernel,
(and ftracetest does) Tom's kselftest patch should be merged
into linux-kselftest instead of tracing tree.
Steve, what would you think?
No worries. As far as kselftest tree is concrned, I can apply these
after rc1 comes out with Tom's patch.
Or I can give Ack and Steve can take these through tracing tree.
thanks,
-- Shuah
