Hi, Andrii! >>>>> On Tue, 26 May 2020 15:32:10 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:41 PM Yauheni Kaliuta > <yauheni.kaliuta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> Actually, a bit more needed :) > From the other kselftest thread, it seems like selftests are not > supporting builds out-of-tree. With that, wouldn't it be simpler to > build in tree and then just copy selftests/bpf directory to wherever > you need to run tests from? It would be simple and reliable. Given I > and probably everyone else never build and run tests out-of-tree, it's > just too easy to break this and you'll be constantly chasing some > non-obvious breakages... > Is there some problem with such approach? This is `make install` ;). I personally do not need OOT build, but since it's in the code, I'd prefer either fix it or remove it, otherwise it's misleading. But I have not got reply from kselftest. >> >> >>>>> On Fri, 22 May 2020 07:13:02 +0300, Yauheni Kaliuta wrote: >> >> > I had a look, here are some fixes. >> > Yauheni Kaliuta (8): >> > selftests/bpf: remove test_align from Makefile >> > selftests/bpf: build bench.o for any $(OUTPUT) >> > selftests/bpf: install btf .c files >> > selftests/bpf: fix object files installation >> > selftests/bpf: add output dir to include list >> > selftests/bpf: fix urandom_read installation >> > selftests/bpf: fix test.h placing for out of tree build >> > selftests/bpf: factor out MKDIR rule >> >> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- >> > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) >> >> > -- >> > 2.26.2 >> >> >> -- >> WBR, >> Yauheni Kaliuta >> -- WBR, Yauheni Kaliuta
