On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 6:30 AM shuah <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 5/3/20 4:09 AM, Alan Maguire wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020, David Gow wrote: > > > >> This patchset contains everything needed to integrate KASAN and KUnit. > >> > >> KUnit will be able to: > >> (1) Fail tests when an unexpected KASAN error occurs > >> (2) Pass tests when an expected KASAN error occurs > >> > >> Convert KASAN tests to KUnit with the exception of copy_user_test > >> because KUnit is unable to test those. > >> > >> Add documentation on how to run the KASAN tests with KUnit and what to > >> expect when running these tests. > >> > >> This patchset depends on: > >> - "[PATCH v3 kunit-next 0/2] kunit: extend kunit resources API" [1] > >> - "[PATCH v3 0/3] Fix some incompatibilites between KASAN and > >> FORTIFY_SOURCE" [2] > >> > >> Changes from v6: > >> - Rebased on top of kselftest/kunit > >> - Rebased on top of Daniel Axtens' fix for FORTIFY_SOURCE > >> incompatibilites [2] > >> - Removed a redundant report_enabled() check. > >> - Fixed some places with out of date Kconfig names in the > >> documentation. > >> > > > > Sorry for the delay in getting to this; I retested the > > series with the above patchsets pre-applied; all looks > > good now, thanks! Looks like Daniel's patchset has a v4 > > so I'm not sure if that will have implications for applying > > your changes on top of it (haven't tested it yet myself). > > > > For the series feel free to add > > > > Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I'll try and take some time to review v7 shortly, but I wanted > > to confirm the issues I saw went away first in case you're > > blocked. The only remaining issue I see is that we'd need the > > named resource patchset to land first; it would be good > > to ensure the API it provides is solid so you won't need to > > respin. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Alan > > > >> Changes from v5: > >> - Split out the panic_on_warn changes to a separate patch. > >> - Fix documentation to fewer to the new Kconfig names. > >> - Fix some changes which were in the wrong patch. > >> - Rebase on top of kselftest/kunit (currently identical to 5.7-rc1) > >> > > > > Hi Brendan, > > Is this series ready to go inot Linux 5.8-rc1? Let me know. > Probably needs rebase on top of kselftest/kunit. I applied > patches from David and Vitor > > thanks, > -- Shuah > Hi Shuah, I think the only things holding this up are the missing dependencies: the "extend kunit resources API" patches[1] for KUnit (which look ready to me), and the "Fix some incompatibilities between KASAN and FORTIFY_SOURCE" changes[2] on the KASAN side (which also seem ready). This patchset may need a (likely rather trivial) rebase on top of whatever versions of those end up merged: I'm happy to do that if necessary. Cheers, -- David [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/1585313122-26441-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#t [2]: http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/2004.3/00735.html
