Re: [PATCH] mm/hmm/test: destroy xa_array instead of looping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 5/15/20 4:15 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 02:45:07PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
The test driver uses an xa_array to store virtual to physical address
translations for a simulated hardware device. The MMU notifier
invalidation callback is used to keep the table consistent with the CPU
page table and is frequently called only for a page or two. However, if
the test process exits unexpectedly or is killed, the range can be
[0..ULONG_MAX] in which case calling xa_erase() for every possible PFN
results in CPU timeouts. Munmap() can result in a large range being
invalidated but in that case, the xa_array is likely to contain entries
that need to be invalidated.
Check for [0..ULONG_MAX] explicitly and just destroy the whole table.

Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@xxxxxxxxxx>

This patch is based on Jason Gunthorpe's hmm tree and should be folded
into the ("mm/hmm/test: add selftest driver for HMM") patch once this
patch is reviewed, etc.

  lib/test_hmm.c | 6 ++++++
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/test_hmm.c b/lib/test_hmm.c
index 8b36c26b717b..b89852ec3c29 100644
+++ b/lib/test_hmm.c
@@ -201,7 +201,13 @@ static void dmirror_do_update(struct dmirror *dmirror, unsigned long start,
  	 * The XArray doesn't hold references to pages since it relies on
  	 * the mmu notifier to clear page pointers when they become stale.
  	 * Therefore, it is OK to just clear the entry.
+	 * However, if the entire address space is being invalidated, it
+	 * takes too long to clear them one at a time so destroy the array.
  	 */
+	if (start == 0 && end == ULONG_MAX) {
+		xa_destroy(&dmirror->pt);
+		return;
+	}
  	for (pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT; pfn < (end >> PAGE_SHIFT); pfn++)
  		xa_erase(&dmirror->pt, pfn);
  }

Just use xa_for_each_range() instead of the naive loop, it already
optimizes against membership and avoids the need for the xa_destroy
hack

Jason


For some reason I had looked at that and rejected it but of course, it works
fine. :-)
Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux