On 4/26/20 1:46 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > Ah, whew, okay. I had just begun instrumenting sfq (the highly > technical term for "adding printks everywhere") to figure out what's > going on. Looks like you've got a handle on it, so I'll let you have > at it. Yes, syzbot manages to put a zero in q->scaled_quantum I will send a fix. > > On the brighter side, it seems like Dmitry's and my effort to get full > coverage of WireGuard has paid off in the sense that tons of packets > wind up being shoveled through it in one way or another, which is > good. > Sure !