Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: test.h - fix warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:56 PM Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:50 PM Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Fix warnings at 'make htmldocs', and formatting issues in the resulting
> > documentation.
> >
> > - test.h: Fix some typos in kernel-doc parameter description.
> >
> > - Documentation/*.rst: Fixing formatting issues, and a duplicate label
> >   issue, since using sphinx.ext.autosectionlabel in conf.py, referes to
> >   headers are generated automatically and sphinx will not complain about
> >   identical headers among documents anymore.
> >
> >   The downside is, automatically generated header labels within one
> >   document now cannot be overwritten manually anymore. Thus duplicate
> >   headers within one document have to have different wording, i.e. this
> >   patch modifies some headers.
> >
> > - Documentation/api/*: Flipping over to a page "API" containing a single
> >   link to another page "API" seems like a formatting issue. The patch
> >   removes one level of indirection.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> A couple of minor comments, but other than that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks!
>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst | 16 ----------------
> >  Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst     |  4 ++--
> >  Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst     | 13 ++++++++-----
> >  Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst     |  4 ++--
> >  include/kunit/test.h                        |  5 +++--
> >  5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst
> > deleted file mode 100644
> > index 9b9bffe5d41a..000000000000
> > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst
> > +++ /dev/null
> > @@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
> > -.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > -
> > -=============
> > -API Reference
> > -=============
> > -.. toctree::
> > -
> > -       test
> > -
> > -This section documents the KUnit kernel testing API. It is divided into the
> > -following sections:
> > -
> > -================================= ==============================================
> > -:doc:`test`                       documents all of the standard testing API
> > -                                  excluding mocking or mocking related features.
> > -================================= ==============================================
>
> Let's hold off on this. We have some other pages we would like to add
> to this directory soonish.

Sure! I appologize, I just missed your last mail that you guys still
plan something in the API section of the document.
So I leave the API page as is, no problem!


> > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst
> > index e93606ecfb01..640bba1f4896 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst
> > @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ KUnit - Unit Testing for the Linux Kernel
> >         start
> >         usage
> >         kunit-tool
> > -       api/index
> > +       api/test
> >         faq
> >
> >  What is KUnit?
> > @@ -88,6 +88,6 @@ How do I use it?
> >
> >  *   :doc:`start` - for new users of KUnit
> >  *   :doc:`usage` - for a more detailed explanation of KUnit features
> > -*   :doc:`api/index` - for the list of KUnit APIs used for testing
> > +*   :doc:`api/test` - for the list of KUnit APIs used for testing
> >  *   :doc:`kunit-tool` - for more information on the kunit_tool helper script
> >  *   :doc:`faq` - for answers to some common questions about KUnit
> > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
> > index e1c5ce80ce12..bb112cf70624 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
> > @@ -32,15 +32,17 @@ test targets as well. The ``.kunitconfig`` should also contain any other config
> >  options required by the tests.
> >
> >  A good starting point for a ``.kunitconfig`` is the KUnit defconfig:
> > +
> >  .. code-block:: bash
> >
> >         cd $PATH_TO_LINUX_REPO
> >         cp arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig .kunitconfig
> >
> >  You can then add any other Kconfig options you wish, e.g.:
> > +
> >  .. code-block:: none
> >
> > -        CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST=y
> > +       CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST=y
> >
> >  :doc:`kunit_tool <kunit-tool>` will ensure that all config options set in
> >  ``.kunitconfig`` are set in the kernel ``.config`` before running the tests.
> > @@ -54,8 +56,8 @@ using.
> >     other tools (such as make menuconfig) to adjust other config options.
> >
> >
> > -Running the tests
> > ------------------
> > +Running the tests (KUnit Wrapper)
> > +---------------------------------
> >
> >  To make sure that everything is set up correctly, simply invoke the Python
> >  wrapper from your kernel repo:
> > @@ -105,8 +107,9 @@ have config options ending in ``_KUNIT_TEST``.
> >  KUnit and KUnit tests can be compiled as modules: in this case the tests in a
> >  module will be run when the module is loaded.
> >
> > -Running the tests
> > ------------------
> > +
> > +Running the tests (w/o KUnit Wrapper)
> > +-------------------------------------
> >
> >  Build and run your kernel as usual. Test output will be written to the kernel
> >  log in `TAP <https://testanything.org/>`_ format.
> > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> > index 473a2361ec37..3c3fe8b5fecc 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> > @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ able to run one test case per invocation.
> >  KUnit debugfs representation
> >  ============================
> >  When kunit test suites are initialized, they create an associated directory
> > -in /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<test-suite>.  The directory contains one file
> > +in ``/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<test-suite>``.  The directory contains one file
> >
> >  - results: "cat results" displays results of each test case and the results
> >    of the entire suite for the last test run.
> > @@ -604,4 +604,4 @@ The debugfs representation is primarily of use when kunit test suites are
> >  run in a native environment, either as modules or builtin.  Having a way
> >  to display results like this is valuable as otherwise results can be
> >  intermixed with other events in dmesg output.  The maximum size of each
> > -results file is KUNIT_LOG_SIZE bytes (defined in include/kunit/test.h).
> > +results file is KUNIT_LOG_SIZE bytes (defined in ``include/kunit/test.h``).
> > diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
> > index 9b0c46a6ca1f..16d548b795b5 100644
> > --- a/include/kunit/test.h
> > +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
> > @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ struct kunit_suite {
> >         void (*exit)(struct kunit *test);
> >         struct kunit_case *test_cases;
> >
> > -       /* private - internal use only */
> > +       /* private: internal use only */
> >         struct dentry *debugfs;
> >         char *log;
> >  };
> > @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites);
> >   * kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite
> >   *                      with KUnit.
> >   *
> > - * @suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite.
> > + * @...: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite, assigned
> > + *           to the pointer @suites.
> >   *
> >   * Registers @suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for
>
> Can you change the @suites param here to match @...?

You mean, in "Registers @suites with the test framework" to something
rather like "Registers @... with"?
Hum, franckly I think, in the documentation it reads better having the
name "suites", that's why I tried to
append a hint, that a passed list of struct kunit_suite initializes
the pointer "suites". Then further in the doc
refered as suites, I think it becomes clear. But let me know. Shall I
use @... instead?

Just give me a brief answer to this mail, then I adjust the patch and
quickly resubmit.

Best,
L



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux