On Mon 23-03-20 15:29:43, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 23-03-20 10:16:59, Rafael Aquini wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 09:31:04AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:35 PM Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Changes for commit 9c4e6b1a7027f ("mm, mlock, vmscan: no more skipping pagevecs") > > > > break this test expectations on the behavior of mlock syscall family immediately > > > > inserting the recently faulted pages into the UNEVICTABLE_LRU, when MCL_ONFAULT is > > > > passed to the syscall as part of its flag-set. > > > > > > mlock* syscalls do not provide any guarantee that the pages will be in > > > unevictable LRU, only that the pages will not be paged-out. The test > > > is checking something very internal to the kernel and this is expected > > > to break. > > > > It was a check expected to be satisfied before the commit, though. > > Getting the mlocked pages inserted directly into the unevictable LRU, > > skipping the pagevec, was established behavior before the aforementioned > > commit, and even though one could argue userspace should not be aware, > > or care, about such inner kernel circles the program in question is not an > > ordinary userspace app, but a kernel selftest that is supposed to check > > for the functionality correctness. > > But mlock (in neither mode) is reall forced to put pages to the ble I meant to say "is not really forced" > UNEVICTABLE_LRU for correctness. If the test is really depending on it > then the selftest is bogus. A real MCL_ONFAULT test should focus on the > user observable contract of this api. And that is that a new mapping > doesn't fault in the page during the mlock call but the memory is locked > after the memory is faulted in. You can use different methods to observe > locked memory - e.g. try to reclaim it and check or check /proc/<pid>/smaps I have just checked the testcase and I believe it is really dubious to check for page flags. Those are really an internal implementation detail. All the available information is available in the /proc/<pid>/smaps file which is already parsed in the test so the test is easily fixable. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs