On 3/2/20 9:50 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:
Hi David,
On 2/28/20 1:18 PM, David Gow wrote:
Remove some of the outmoded "Why KUnit" rationale, and move some
UML-specific information to the kunit_tool page. Also update the Getting
Started guide to mention running tests without the kunit_tool wrapper.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxx>
---
Sorry: I missed a couple of issues in the last version. They're fixed
here, and I think this should be ready to go.
Changelog:
v4:
- Fix typo: s/offsers/offers
- Talk about KUnit tests running on most "architectures" instead of
"kernel configurations.
v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200214235723.254228-1-davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
- Added a note that KUnit can be used with UML, both with and without
kunit_tool to replace the section moved to kunit_tool.
v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/f99a3d4d-ad65-5fd1-3407-db33f378b1fa@xxxxxxxxx/T/
- Reinstated the "Why Kunit?" section, minus the comparison with other
testing frameworks (covered in the FAQ), and the description of UML.
- Moved the description of UML into to kunit_tool page.
- Tidied up the wording around how KUnit is built and run to make it
work
without the UML description.
v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/9c703dea-a9e1-94e2-c12d-3cb0a09e75ac@xxxxxxxxx/T/
- Initial patch
Thanks for all the changes. The documents are now much more understandable
and useful.
Is this ready to go? If it goes through doc tree:
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Otherwise, I can pic it up.
thanks,
-- Shuah
