* André Almeida: > Thanks everyone for the feedback around our mechanism. Are the > performance benefits of implementing a syscall to wait on a single futex > significant enough to maintain it instead of just using > `sys_futex_waitv()` with `nr_waiters = 1`? If we join both cases in a > single interface, we may even add a new member for NUMA hint in `struct > futex_wait`. Some seccomp user might want to verify the address, and that's easier if it's in an argument. But that's just a rather minor aspect. Do you propose to drop the storage requirement for the NUMA hint next to the futex completely? Thanks, Florian
