On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:50 AM Sandipan Das <sandipan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 12/02/20 3:01 am, Mina Almasry wrote: > > The tests use both shared and private mapped hugetlb memory, and > > monitors the hugetlb usage counter as well as the hugetlb reservation > > counter. They test different configurations such as hugetlb memory usage > > via hugetlbfs, or MAP_HUGETLB, or shmget/shmat, and with and without > > MAP_POPULATE. > > > > Also add test for hugetlb reservation reparenting, since this is > > a subtle issue. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: sandipan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Hi folks, Sandipan provided a Tested-by but this is more or less the only patch in the series that is awaiting review. Can someone take a look? Shuah, you started reviewing this months ago and I addressed the comments. Maybe you can take another look? Thanks in advance!
