Re: [PATCH v11 8/9] hugetlb_cgroup: Add hugetlb_cgroup reservation tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 4:42 AM Sandipan Das <sandipan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 05/02/20 4:03 am, Mina Almasry wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 12:36 PM Mina Almasry <almasrymina@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> So the problem in this log seems to be that this log line is missing:
> >>     echo Waiting for hugetlb memory to reach size $size.
> >>
> >> The way the test works is that it starts a process that writes the
> >> hugetlb memory, then it *should* wait until the memory is written,
> >> then it should record the cgroup accounting and kill the process. It
> >> seems from your log that the wait doesn't happen, so the test
> >> continues before the background process has had time to write the
> >> memory properly. Essentially wait_for_hugetlb_memory_to_get_written()
> >> never gets called in your log.
> >>
> >> Can you try this additional attached diff on top of your changes? I
> >> attached the diff and pasted the same here, hopefully one works for
> >> you:
> >> ...
> >
> > I got my hands on a machine with 16MB default hugepage size and
> > charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh passes now after my changes. Please let me
> > know if you still run into issues.
> >
>
> With your updates, the tests are passing. Ran the tests on a ppc64 system
> that uses radix MMU (2MB hugepages) and everything passed there as well.
>

Thanks, please consider reviewing the next iteration of the patch then.

> - Sandipan
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux