(replying again as plain text for mailing lists) ----- On Jan 22, 2020, at 10:44 AM, Jan Ziak 0xe2.0x9a.0x9b@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hello > I would like to note that this does not help userspace to express dynamic > scheduling relationships among processes/threads such as "do not run processes > A and B on the same core" or "run processes A and B on cores sharing the same > L2 cache". Indeed, this is not what this system call is trying to solve. Does the name "pin_on_cpu" lead to confusion here ? I thought that cgroups was already the mechanism taking care of this kind of requirement. Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
