On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:16:10PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 07:52:16PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:42:17AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > Doesn't bother me, I could do it in a patch ontop. But your call.
> > >
> > > No objection here.
> >
> > Something like this:
> >
> > ---
> > From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > ... so that "offsetting" is spelled the same as the respective VMX feature
> > bit VMX_FEATURE_TSC_OFFSETTING.
> >
> > No functional changes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
Yah, so I tried to do a test-merge with linux-next to see what surprises should
I be prepared for and there's the first one:
5e3d394fdd9e ("KVM: VMX: Fix the spelling of CPU_BASED_USE_TSC_OFFSETTING")
which is already in Paolo's tree. Dropping it on my side.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
