[Cc Kees in case he knows something about where arch specific tests live or whether we have a framework for this] On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 07:03:32PM +0100, Amanieu d'Antras wrote: > On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 6:39 PM Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I also ran the native and compat selftests but, unfortunately, they all > > pass even without this patch. Do you reckon it would be possible to update > > them to check the tls pointer? > > Here's the program I used for testing on arm64. I considered adding it > to the selftests but there is no portable way of reading the TLS > register on all architectures. I'm not saying you need to do this right now. It feels like we must've run into the "this is architecture specific"-and-we-want-to-test-this issue before... Do we have a place where architecture specific selftests live? > > #include <sys/syscall.h> > #include <unistd.h> > #include <stdio.h> > #include <stdint.h> > > #define __NR_clone3 435 > struct clone_args { > uint64_t flags; > uint64_t pidfd; > uint64_t child_tid; > uint64_t parent_tid; > uint64_t exit_signal; > uint64_t stack; > uint64_t stack_size; > uint64_t tls; > }; > > #define USE_CLONE3 > > int main() { > printf("Before fork: tp = %p\n", __builtin_thread_pointer()); > #ifdef USE_CLONE3 > struct clone_args args = { > .flags = CLONE_SETTLS, > .tls = (uint64_t)__builtin_thread_pointer(), > }; > int ret = syscall(__NR_clone3, &args, sizeof(args)); > #else > int ret = syscall(__NR_clone, CLONE_SETTLS, 0, 0, > __builtin_thread_pointer(), 0); > #endif > printf("Fork returned %d, tp = %p\n", ret, __builtin_thread_pointer()); > }