On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 07:23:46PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 12/12/19 19:18, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > Using v<feature> across the board makes sense to keep things consistent, > > i.e. vnmi, vtpr, vapic, etc... > > > > Anyone have thoughts on how to shorten "APIC-register virtualization" > > without colliding with vapic or apicv? I currently have apic_reg_virt, > > which is a bit wordy. apic_regv isn't awful, but I don't love it. > > Perhaps vapic_access and vapic_register? I ended up going with vapic and vapic_reg, figured everyone looking at this knows what "reg" is short for, and I like the progression shown by vapic -> vapic_reg.
