On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:55:28PM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > While openat2(2) is still not yet in Linus's tree, we can take this > opportunity to iron out some small warts that weren't noticed earlier: > > * A fix was suggested by Florian Weimer, to separate the openat2 > definitions so glibc can use the header directly. I've put the > maintainership under VFS but let me know if you'd prefer it belong > ot the fcntl folks. > > * Having heterogenous field sizes in an extensible struct results in > "padding hole" problems when adding new fields (in addition the > correct error to use for non-zero padding isn't entirely clear ). > The simplest solution is to just copy clone(3)'s model -- always use > u64s. It will waste a little more space in the struct, but it > removes a possible future headache. Am I imagining things or did I get the same patch series twice? Christian
