On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 06:42:17PM +0200, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> QOS requests for DEFAULT_VALUE are supposed to be ignored but this is
> not the case for FREQ_QOS_MAX. Adding one request for MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE
> and one for a real value will cause freq_qos_read_value to unexpectedly
> return MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE (-1).
>
> This happens because freq_qos max value is aggregated with PM_QOS_MIN
> but FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE is (-1) so it's smaller than other
> values.
>
> Fix this by redefining FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE to S32_MAX.
>
> Looking at current users for freq_qos it seems that none of them create
> requests for FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE.
>
> Fixes: 77751a466ebd ("PM: QoS: Introduce frequency QoS")
nit: you could add:
Reported-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/pm_qos.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> index ebf5ef17cc2a..24a6263c9931 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> @@ -254,11 +254,11 @@ static inline s32 dev_pm_qos_raw_resume_latency(struct device *dev)
> return PM_QOS_RESUME_LATENCY_NO_CONSTRAINT;
> }
> #endif
>
> #define FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE 0
> -#define FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE (-1)
> +#define FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE S32_MAX
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
