On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 07:50:13AM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:10:55AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > The ifndef for SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_CONTINUE was placed under the > > ifndef for the SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER feature. This will not > > work on systems that do support SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER but do not > > support SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_CONTINUE. So move the latter ifndef out of > > the former ifndef's scope. > > > > 2019-10-20 11:14:01 make run_tests -C seccomp > > make: Entering directory '/usr/src/perf_selftests-x86_64-rhel-7.6-0eebfed2954f152259cae0ad57b91d3ea92968e8/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp' > > gcc -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall seccomp_bpf.c -lpthread -o seccomp_bpf > > seccomp_bpf.c: In function ‘user_notification_continue’: > > seccomp_bpf.c:3562:15: error: ‘SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_CONTINUE’ undeclared (first use in this function) > > resp.flags = SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_CONTINUE; > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > seccomp_bpf.c:3562:15: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > > Makefile:12: recipe for target 'seccomp_bpf' failed > > make: *** [seccomp_bpf] Error 1 > > make: Leaving directory '/usr/src/perf_selftests-x86_64-rhel-7.6-0eebfed2954f152259cae0ad57b91d3ea92968e8/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp' > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@xxxxxxxxx> > > Fixes: 0eebfed2954f ("seccomp: test SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_CONTINUE") > > Cc: linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@xxxxxxxx> Thanks! Applied to my for-next/seccomp tree. -- Kees Cook