On 10/16/19 6:32 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:48:59 -0700 David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Since KUnit is not yet in Linus' branch, though, it probably makes
sense to put this test into the linux-kselftest/test branch, so that
there aren't any chances of the list test getting in without the KUnit
infrastructure. Ultimately, once KUnit is upstream, this shouldn't be
an issue, but it is probably easier to consolidate things for now.
Does that sound sensible?
Well, whatever. I have a note that it's dependent on kunit.
David and Andrew,
I have a few comments on CONFIG naming to be consistent with the other
kunit ext4 test and a couple of other comments that would requite v3.
I would like to bundle these in the pull request with KUnit framework.
Hope that is okay with you.
thanks,
-- Shuah
