On 10/16, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 06:24:09PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > And why task_ if it accepts pid+pid_type? May be pid_has_task() or > > something like this... > > Given what I said above that might be a decent name. > > > > > OK, since I can't suggest a better name I won't really argue. Feel free > > to add my reviewed-by to this series. > > No, naming is important. Thanks for being picky about that too and I'll > happily resend. :) Thanks ;) May be pid_in_use() ? Up to you, anything which starts with pid_ looks better to me than task_alive(). Oleg.
