Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] hugetlb_cgroup: Add hugetlb_cgroup reservation limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/11/19 1:41 PM, Mina Almasry wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:10 PM Mina Almasry <almasrymina@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:47 AM Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 9/19/19 3:24 PM, Mina Almasry wrote:
>>
>> Mike, note your suggestion above to check if the page hugetlb_cgroup
>> is null doesn't work if we want to keep the current counter working
>> the same: the page will always have a hugetlb_cgroup that points that
>> contains the old counter. Any ideas how to apply this new counter
>> behavior to a private NORESERVE mappings? Is there maybe a flag I can
>> set on the pages at allocation time that I can read on free time to
>> know whether to uncharge the hugetlb_cgroup or not?
> 
> Reading the code and asking around a bit, it seems the pointer to the
> hugetlb_cgroup is in page[2].private. Is it reasonable to use
> page[3].private to store the hugetlb_cgroup to uncharge for the new
> counter and increment HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER to 3? I think that
> would solve my problem. When allocating a private NORESERVE page, set
> page[3].private to the hugetlb_cgroup to uncharge, then on
> free_huge_page, check page[3].private, if it is non-NULL, uncharge the
> new counter on it.

Sorry for not responding sooner.  This approach should work, and it looks like
you have a v6 of the series.  I'll take a look.

-- 
Mike Kravetz



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux