Re: [Automated-testing] syzkaller reproducers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:27 PM Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi!
> > We discussed collecting and uploading all syzkaller reproducers
> > somewhere. You wanted to see how they look. I've uploaded all current
> > reproducers here:
> > https://github.com/dvyukov/syzkaller-repros
> > Minimalistic build/run scripts are included.
>
> What is the reason behind statically linking the reproducers?
>
> The difference between static and dynamic binary is a bit less than 4MB,
> which gives difference of several gigabytes for the whole repo. This
> amount of binary data would complicate and slow down any CI
> significantly...

Simply being able to run programs on a different machine. Dynamic
binaries generally don't run on a different linux machine. If you can
build dynamic binaries so that they run on test machine, feel free to
drop -static.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux