Re: [PATCH v1] fs/ext4/inode-test: KUnit test for ext4 inode.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Iurii,

Thanks for the patch.

On 10/8/19 8:42 PM, Iurii Zaikin wrote:
Note: this patch is intended to be applied against kselftest/test branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/log/?h=test



This doesn't belong here. You can add it to commit header

[PATCH linux-kselftest/test] also you don't need v1 in there.

KUnit tests for decoding extended 64 bit timestamps.

Please give more details on what these tests do. More information
on range of timestamps would be helpful. I see you have 2038 test
and it would be great to call out the ranges and conditions it is
resting.


Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/ext4/Kconfig      |  12 +++
  fs/ext4/Makefile     |   1 +
  fs/ext4/inode-test.c | 217 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 230 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 fs/ext4/inode-test.c

diff --git a/fs/ext4/Kconfig b/fs/ext4/Kconfig
index cbb5ca830e57..72c26abbce4c 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/ext4/Kconfig
@@ -106,3 +106,15 @@ config EXT4_DEBUG
    If you select Y here, then you will be able to turn on debugging
    with a command such as:
   echo 1 > /sys/module/ext4/parameters/mballoc_debug
+
+config EXT4_INODE_KUNIT_TEST
+ bool "KUnit test for ext4 inode"
+ depends on EXT4_FS
+ depends on KUNIT
+ help
+  This builds the ext4 inode sysctl unit test, which runs on boot.
+  Tests the encoding correctness of ext4 inode.
+  For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer
+  to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
+
+  If unsure, say N.
diff --git a/fs/ext4/Makefile b/fs/ext4/Makefile
index b17ddc229ac5..1eeb8b449255 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/Makefile
+++ b/fs/ext4/Makefile
@@ -13,4 +13,5 @@ ext4-y := balloc.o bitmap.o block_validity.o dir.o
ext4_jbd2.o extents.o \

  ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL) += acl.o
  ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY) += xattr_security.o
+ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_INODE_KUNIT_TEST) += inode-test.o
  ext4-$(CONFIG_FS_VERITY) += verity.o
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0ecb8dd5e0c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

Follow the commenting style recommended in the coding-style doc.
/* ---- */

+/*
+ * KUnit test of ext4 inode.
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/time64.h>
+
+#include "ext4.h"
+
+// binary: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
+#define LOWER_MSB_0 0L
+// binary: 01111111 11111111 11111111 11111111
+#define UPPER_MSB_0 0x7fffffffL
+// binary: 10000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
+#define LOWER_MSB_1 (-0x80000000L)
+// binary: 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111
+#define UPPER_MSB_1 (-1L)
+
+#define CASE_NAME_FORMAT "%s: msb:%x lower_bound:%x extra_bits: %x"
+
+struct timestamp_expectation {
+ const char *test_case_name;
+ struct timespec64 expected;
+ u32 extra_bits;
+ bool msb_set;
+ bool lower_bound;
+};
+
+static time64_t get_32bit_time(const struct timestamp_expectation * const test)
+{
+ if (test->msb_set) {
+ if (test->lower_bound)
+ return LOWER_MSB_1;
+
+ return UPPER_MSB_1;
+ }

Can you add information on what you are trying to test.
Please do the same for all tests.

+
+ if (test->lower_bound)
+ return LOWER_MSB_0;
+ return UPPER_MSB_0;
+}
+
+
+static void inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ const struct timestamp_expectation test_data[] = {
+ {
+ .test_case_name = "1901-12-13",
+ .msb_set = true,
+ .lower_bound = true,
+ .extra_bits = 0,
+ .expected = {.tv_sec = -0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ },
+

I see that you use the same tv_nsec for all tests. Is there
a reason for that? Would it be helpful to vary it?

+ {
+ .test_case_name = "1969-12-31",
+ .msb_set = true,
+ .lower_bound = false,
+ .extra_bits = 0,
+ .expected = {.tv_sec = -1LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ },
+
+ {
+ .test_case_name = "1970-01-01",
+ .msb_set = false,
+ .lower_bound = true,
+ .extra_bits = 0,
+ .expected = {0LL, 0L},
+ },
+
+ {
+ .test_case_name = "2038-01-19",
+ .msb_set = false,
+ .lower_bound = false,
+ .extra_bits = 0,
+ .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x7fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ },
+
+ {
+ .test_case_name = "2038-01-19",
+ .msb_set = true,
+ .lower_bound = true,
+ .extra_bits = 1,
+ .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ },
+
+ {
+ .test_case_name = "2106-02-07",
+ .msb_set = true,
+ .lower_bound = false,
+ .extra_bits = 1,
+ .expected = {.tv_sec = 0xffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ },
+
+ {
+ .test_case_name = "2106-02-07",
+ .msb_set = false,
+ .lower_bound = true,
+ .extra_bits = 1,
+ .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x100000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0LL},
+ },
+
+ {
+ .test_case_name = "2174-02-25",
+ .msb_set = false,
+ .lower_bound = false,
+ .extra_bits = 1,
+ .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x17fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ },
+
+ {
+ .test_case_name = "2174-02-25",
+ .msb_set = true,
+ .lower_bound = true,
+ .extra_bits =  2,
+ .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x180000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ },
+
+ {
+ .test_case_name = "2242-03-16",
+ .msb_set = true,
+ .lower_bound = false,
+ .extra_bits = 2,
+ .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x1ffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ },
+
+ {
+ .test_case_name = "2242-03-16",
+ .msb_set = false,
+ .lower_bound = true,
+ .extra_bits = 2,
+ .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x200000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ },
+
+ {
+ .test_case_name = " 2310-04-04",
+ .msb_set = false,
+ .lower_bound = false,
+ .extra_bits = 2,
+ .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ },
+

Get rid of this. Add it when you can add it later. I don't
like to see these TODOs with blocks of code commented out.

+ /* TODO: enable when legacy encoding in ext4.h is disabled.
+ *{
+ * .test_case_name = "2310-04-04",
+ * .msb_set = true,
+ * .lower_bound = true,
+ * .extra_bits = 3,
+ * .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x280000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ *},
+ *
+ *{
+ * .test_case_name = "2378-04-22",
+ * .msb_set = true,
+ * .lower_bound = false,
+ * .extra_bits = 3,
+ * .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x2ffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ * },
+ */
+
+ {
+ .test_case_name = "2378-04-22",
+ .msb_set = false,
+ .lower_bound = true,
+ .extra_bits = 3,
+ .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ },
+
+ {
+ .test_case_name = "2446-05-10",
+ .msb_set = false,
+ .lower_bound = false,
+ .extra_bits = 3,
+ .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x37fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ }
+ };
+
+ struct timespec64 timestamp;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); ++i) {
+ timestamp.tv_sec = get_32bit_time(&test_data[i]);
+ ext4_decode_extra_time(&timestamp,
+       cpu_to_le32(test_data[i].extra_bits));
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
+    test_data[i].expected.tv_sec,
+    timestamp.tv_sec,
+    CASE_NAME_FORMAT,
+    test_data[i].test_case_name,
+    test_data[i].msb_set,
+    test_data[i].lower_bound,
+    test_data[i].extra_bits);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
+    test_data[i].expected.tv_nsec,
+    timestamp.tv_nsec,
+    CASE_NAME_FORMAT,
+    test_data[i].test_case_name,
+    test_data[i].msb_set,
+    test_data[i].lower_bound,
+    test_data[i].extra_bits);
+ }
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case ext4_inode_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite ext4_inode_test_suite = {
+ .name = "ext4_inode_test",
+ .test_cases = ext4_inode_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suite(ext4_inode_test_suite);
--
2.23.0.700.g56cf767bdb-goog


thanks,
-- Shuah



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux