On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 21:58 +0000, Tim.Bird@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Joe Perches [] > IMHO %pV should be avoided if possible. Just because people are > doing it doesn't mean it should be used when it is not necessary. Well, as the guy that created %pV, I of course have a different opinion. > > then wouldn't it be easier to pass in the > > > kernel level as a separate parameter and then strip off all printk > > > headers like this: > > > > Depends on whether or not you care for overall > > object size. Consolidated formats with the > > embedded KERN_<LEVEL> like suggested are smaller > > overall object size. > > This is an argument I can agree with. I'm generally in favor of > things that lessen kernel size creep. :-) As am I.
