Re: [PATCH] selftests/livepatch: add test skip handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/15/19 2:50 AM, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
On 7/14/19 7:58 PM, Joe Lawrence wrote:
Before running a livpeatch self-test, first verify that we've built and
installed the livepatch self-test kernel modules by running a 'modprobe
--dry-run'.  This should catch a few environment issues, including
!CONFIG_LIVEPATCH and !CONFIG_TEST_LIVEPATCH.  In these cases, exit
gracefully with test-skip status rather than test-fail status.

Reported-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[...]

+function assert_mod() {
+	local mod="$1"
+
+	if ! modprobe --dry-run "$mod" &>/dev/null ; then

Just a preference comment, shorter version 'modprobe -q -n'
can be used here.


Hi Kamalesh,

Re: command line options: my preference has been to use the long form command switches inside scripts as they are more likely to be self documenting than their short counterparts. e.g. I could have guessed that -q is --quiet, but not that -n is --dry-run.

Re: --quiet vs. command redirection: Another detail I don't have a strong opinion about. I guess I very slightly prefer the redirect so I don't have to research various modprobe versions to determine if --quiet is universally supported (it probably is).

In both cases, I'll defer to whatever reviewers think is more readable/conventional for the self-tests.

-- Joe



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux